Full Movie Reviews
Rating of
2.5/4
"The Conversation" by Yojimbo
Yojimbo - wrote on 03/20/2012
An obsessive surveillance expert becomes convinced that a sound recording he has made could result in the murder of a young couple. The Conversation is a very, very clever film. It's got the kind of intelligent, original "twist in the tale" premise that Christopher Nolan has made his own and technically it's marvellous. A really creative use of sound design and artful direction from Coppola is augmented by an excellent central performance by Hackman making for a film that has much to be admired. The main problem is the detachment and sterility of the subject matter. It's very difficult to warm to such an emotionally cold and compulsive central character and as such it's all a little uninvolving; you can see exactly WHY Coppola made all the creative choices he did but that does not …
Rating of
3.5/4
The Conversation review
Daniel Corleone - wrote on 03/19/2012
" I'm not following you, I'm looking for you. There's a big difference." A slow burner that builds up well towards the wonderful finale. Harry Caul (Gene Hackman) is a surveillance expert who works with Stan (John Cazale). A couple (Cindy Williams and Frederic Forrest) is bugged at a busy square. The story becomes interesting when the source of the surveillance has been revealed. Its romantic angle of Caul’s girl, and an almost non-existent soundtrack were somewhat dissatisfying and lengthy. Screenplay was impressive with lines like: "Walking around in circles." and "A lot of fun you are. You're supposed to tease me, give hints, make me guess, you know." The Conversation’s premise and themes of technology, distrust, bad communication and privacy were very interesting if only …
Rating of
4/4
"He'd kill us if he got the chance."
Arbogast1960 - wrote on 03/28/2008
It is truly stunning that, in the same year, Coppola released both this film and The Godfather Part II. Add in The Godfather from two years prior and the man made three masterpieces in as many years. How can this possibly be the same person who directed Jack? Hackman is wonderful in a slightly different role, a quiet, lonely, socially inept surveillance expert who happens to be incapable of securing his own privacy from invasion. Like Blow-Up with sound instead of pictures, the film revolves around a recording of a couple's conversation seemingly indicating a plot to have them murdered. As Hackman becomes increasingly obsessed with illuminating the recording's meaning, the audience is long kept guessing as to what is going on, given the protagonist's unreliability. And like Rear …