Quick Movie Reviews
Rating of
1.5/4
Matthew Brady - wrote on 07/20/2014
How dare there took the 80's classic and ruined it by putting in unexplained scenes and a crappy ending.
Rating of
1.5/4
Yojimbo - wrote on 10/01/2012
Tiresome cash-in and virtual remake of the original. Sadly there's obviously no John Belushi, who is replaced by John Goodman who has little to work with apart from an irritating child.
Rating of
1/4
Unknown - wrote on 09/24/2011
Terrible sequel. A blatant rehash of the first's plot, but without an actual story. A random assemblage of scenes that make no sense. It's not funny at all. Entirely lazy and boring effort of filmmaking. The only saving grace are the well performed musical numbers. Everything else is a travesty. One of the worst sequels I've ever seen.
Rating of
0.5/4
dukeakasmudge - wrote on 09/18/2011
What the hell were they thinking???? This movie is garbage.Watch the original version.Worst remake ever!!!
Rating of
0.5/4
The SHC - wrote on 03/07/2009
Awful movie. They never should have made a sequel, complete disgrace to the origional film.
Rating of
1.5/4
Porkchop Express - wrote on 07/11/2007
Why try? Why? The original is all that was needed! Horrible flick.
Rating of
1.5/4
Chris Kavan - wrote on 02/13/2007
If it was for the music alone - this movie would get four stars. However hard this movie tries to be Blues Brothers - and it is pretty much the same plot from the first one - it just doesn't have the magic.
