Quick Movie Reviews
Rating of
2.5/4
Mohammad - wrote on 07/17/2012
The movie has such amazing dialogs but low cgi quatity
Rating of
0.5/4
dukeakasmudge - wrote on 09/28/2011
Garbage.King Kong Bundy wouldve been great as Kingpin
Rating of
1.5/4
mitchellyoung - wrote on 08/07/2011
The story of Daredevil is one with potential to be a dark and significant exploration of crime and morality with a unique and vulnerable hero. Sadly, this film misses all of that and, instead, creates Daredevil as a ridiculous and cartoony do-gooder with an ever more ridiculous villain (Colin Farrell has never appeared more silly.)
Rating of
1.5/4
Unknown - wrote on 08/05/2011
Below average comic film. Could've done more with the characters and the action wasn't good. The director's cut is only a fraction of an improvement.
Rating of
3/4
sapien - wrote on 01/25/2010
I actually liked this movie, and I'm not afraid to admit it, damnit!
Rating of
2/4
jmoney1776 - wrote on 11/02/2007
Daredevil is mediocre at best and boring at worst. Affleck and Farrell are good in it, Garner is terribly mis-cast, and Duncan does the best with what he's got. Unfortunately that's not much. Watch it if you like the comic or superhero movies in general. Otherwise don't bother.
Rating of
1.5/4
Chris Kavan - wrote on 10/26/2007
Action aside, there's not much else I could recommend this movie for. There's a lot of good casting choices, but no one looks comfortable in there roles, save for bat-crazy Colin Farrell who is perfect for Bullseye.
Rating of
3/4
Porkchop Express - wrote on 04/28/2007
I love this movie. I thought the characters lived up to the comic books, the action scenes were awesome. Besides the Daredevil and Kingpin, Bullseye was awesome, nothing like killing an old lady with a peanut!
Rating of
2/4
Josh C - wrote on 04/27/2007
Lots of decent action, cheesy villains and mediocre acting. The surprising part about this movie is who they have a bunch of good actors and produce a movie that is just so-so at best. I do enjoy the action though.
