Quick Movie Reviews
Rating of
3/4
kustaa - wrote on 05/26/2009
The movies is good for several reasons, one of the them is the attempt to keep continuity and consistency, and the other is the effort to make it similar to the tv show. Listening the music, specially, bought me a tear to my eye. The rest is all hollywood crap, but at least its cool and entertaining. Ed Norton can make anything. Glad to see some diversity there.
Rating of
2.5/4
Chris Kavan - wrote on 05/10/2009
A much more action-packed Incredible Hulk than Ang Lee's version. It's not necessarily better (though I prefer Norton over Bana any day) but it's not worse either. I do think this one is much more fun to watch.
Rating of
3/4
SmokeScreener - wrote on 04/25/2009
This was a well-told follow-up to Ang Lee's "Hulk". Edward Norton gave a very sympathetic performance as David Banner, and Tim Roth was excellent as the villain. Sadly, William Hurt's character chain-smokes cigars throughout the movie... including the opening credit sequence. This is an odd touch, since his character (Iplayed previously by Sam Elliottdid not smoke in the original film! As a result, the film earned a SmokeScreeners rating of 4 Butts (http://tinyurl.com/dz63le).
Rating of
3.5/4
shutterspeed777 - wrote on 04/25/2009
This is an incredible film. I knew that somewhere down the road, things are gonna get better for the INCREDIBLE HULK. And it finally came. Not that it cannot be bettered from here. But this is such a leap of improvement from any (TV or Movie) version of this green-colored monster. The real interesting aspect of this whole metamorphosis was that it really was more of consciousness switch. What I meant by that was that after effects of the failed experiment caused the subconscious to surface and the conscious psyche to recede. Just my take. Marvelous movie.
Rating of
2.5/4
Bimmerchik4 - wrote on 03/09/2009
I haven't seen the first one. I thought it was pretty good. I love Edward Norton I thought he played the part really well. The special effects were good. Overall a decent action movie.
Rating of
3/4
Josh C - wrote on 10/26/2008
I liked it more than the one that came out in 2003. Edward Norton was cooler and the story itself was actually good. I still prefer Jennifer Connely to Liv Tyler for the girlfriend though. The special effects were awesome.
Rating of
2.5/4
Gaia - wrote on 10/23/2008
As most have said, this was much better then the original Hulk movie that was made. If you didn't like the first one at all ( like me ) then don't throw this one in the gutter just yet. Just watch it, it's worth it.
Rating of
2/4
PsychoKing1227 - wrote on 10/06/2008
All I really have to say is that this was SO SO SO SO SO SO SOOOOOOOOOO much better than the Sam Raimi piece of garbage that came out a fear years ago. Not incredible (bu duh cha) and not that amazing, though again, much better than Sam Raimi's trash.
Rating of
3/4
patjohnson76 - wrote on 07/10/2008
This is about what I expected from this movie - good special effects, lots of action, and a nice set up for future films. I was pretty happy with what I got. Not a lot of time spent on backstory (which doomed Hulk), so it isn't long before the big green guy makes his appearance. Just sit back and enjoy the ride, as long as you don't expect much from a comic book movie such as this, you should enjoy it.
Rating of
3/4
Ollievee79 - wrote on 07/07/2008
This movie was right up there for me as far as great super hero movies go. Edward Norton was a great choice for The Hulk, but then again I love everything he does. The special effects were amazing, and the last few seconds of the movie put a huge smile on my face. Woohoo! I just wish the teenagers behind me in the theater would have shut their mouths for two seconds. Don't you hate that?
