Rating of
1.5/4
See you again soon Freddie!
nyp09 - wrote on 05/24/10
The horror genre is one that produces many films which are classically predictable, especially if that film is a remake like “A Nightmare On Elm Street”. There is absolutely no reason why this film had to have been remade. There are definitely some differences between the original and the remake, but the differences of the remake are nothing of great importance. However, horror fans will flock to see this film just for the love of Freddie Krueger. As much as they will love seeing the man back on the big screen, they will surely be disappointed by his new look. The film begins with the first victim, Dean (Twilight heart throb Kellan Lutz)being killed in his sleep in front of his friends in a diner. Several of his friends start experiencing the same nightmares Dean complained of having, in which a man in a striped sweater with knives as fingers is trying to kill them. To stay alive, they have to stay awake, because if they fall asleep, they may not wake up.
“A Nightmare On Elm Street”, remake or not, is just a typical horror film. You know when the scares are coming and it is inevitable that there is going to be a scare right at the beginning and at the end. It is still a scary movie and it will leave many people gasping in fright in the cinema. There are some extremely gory bits, although there is a lack of sex which is actually refreshing for a horror movie as it is normally a prerequisite for horror films such as this these days. For a horror film such as this, it is surprisingly well made. The cinematography is not bad at all and the tranquillity of Elm Street is captured perfectly on camera. The disruption of innocence is also captured well and does definitely allow for some disturbing moments. The film can be very slow in parts, but maintains momentum for the finale.
Jackie Earle Haley‘s Freddie Krueger does not measure up at all to Robert Englund’s Krueger of the original films. The original Krueger was much creepier and unsettling than the new Krueger. The new Krueger’s bark is worse than his bite. You almost wish that you could just listen to Krueger’s eerie voice throughout the film rather than see him as this would be far scarier. However, Haley does not do badly in the role, he just has a lot to live up to, as horror far will agree. The supporting cast of teenage victims do not give over the top good performances, but are mediocre. The majority of them are just bland and do not bring much to the film. Perhaps the two best performances out of the group of friends are by Katie Cassidy as Kris and Thomas Dekker as Jesse. Cassidy, although her role is untimely brief, does give a good performance with true sadness and terror. Dekker starts of weak, but gets stronger as his role progresses.
Even as a stand alone film, “A Nightmare On Elm Street” does not impress. It is predictable and covers all the usual horror film bases (besides the un-necessary sex scenes the majority have). However, the film is generally well made and the end is still very disturbing and suspenseful. We’ll see you again next time Freddie!
