Quick Movie Reviews
Rating of
2/4
Chris Kavan - wrote on 03/01/2013
Whereas the first two used a more found footage style, this is much more traditional horror setup. Unfortunately, it just isn't the right style - plus, trying to mix in the occasional comedic moment just falls flat. They try to keep up the religious element set up in the first two films, but it seems a tenuous link at best. If they make another, hopefully it follows the first two films and forgets about his one entirely.
Rating of
1.5/4
Unknown - wrote on 11/22/2012
Having never seen the first two [REC] films, I don't know how this one stacks up. I do know that this installment drops the 'found footage' style, which was a surprise considering most of the first act is filmed that way. There isn't much in terms of story/plot. It's essentially just people running here and there, being attacked by and/or killing infected. The directing and gore are okay, but the rest is flat, dumb and cliche.
Rating of
1/4
liisssaa - wrote on 08/03/2012
oke well, i don't even know where to begin. First of all i thought the first two movies were good. They were exiting, thrilling and scared the crap out of me but this one was really disappointing. I thought this one was really boring. In the beginning i didn't even understand what it was about. Maybe i wasn't paying enough attention to it but it didn't got by attention like the first one did. I thought it was quite stupid how the men where dressed up like knight and were running around with swords and i din't like the ending. Why cut of the arm when she's already infected i mean that won't even help you one bit.
